Most modular container projects complete permitting within 6 to 16 weeks, depending on the state workload, backlog, and project complexity.
State modular programs review the factory-built structure; local jurisdictions review the site and issue occupancy permits.
Delays usually come from incomplete documentation or review office queue backlogs — not from the containers themselves.
When customers ask, “How long will permitting take?” they’re not really looking for a number. They want to know when the uncertainty ends.
“The fear isn’t that permitting takes long — it’s that no one can tell you how long. Our goal is to replace that fear with facts.” — Stephen Shang, CEO, Falcon Structures
This Field Note replaces speculation with structure: what the review steps are, how different states approach them, and what project teams can control.
Every modular container project moves through two separate but parallel review paths:
Each authority has its own queue, scope, and communication style.
Recognizing that dual structure early allows you to plan for overlap rather than waiting for one to finish before starting the other.
Learn more: FIELD NOTE 01 - Key Permitting Steps for Shipping Container Buildings
Most states don’t publish container-specific permitting timelines, but several modular programs release estimated turnaround targets for plan checks and inspections.
These serve as useful benchmarks — not guarantees:
These figures represent typical review windows under normal workload conditions for factory-built modular construction. They are not container-specific guarantees. Actual durations vary based on reviewer availability, documentation completeness, and coordination between state and local authorities.
Typical permitting range: 6–16 weeks under normal workloads.
Longer projects: Multi-unit or multi-state developments may extend to 20+ weeks due to repeated reviews, seismic considerations, accessibility variances, or added coordination.
State and local reviews often run in parallel rather than sequentially. Projects that confirm jurisdiction early, submit complete documentation, and coordinate reviews concurrently tend to experience more predictable timelines, even when total duration varies.
The permitting duration isn’t dictated by container construction. It’s shaped by administrative variables:
Recognizing these influences helps project teams manage expectations and avoid misplaced frustration.
Permitting is most efficient when state and local reviews run concurrently rather than sequentially:
Parallel coordination is the approach Falcon prefers because it doesn’t just shorten the permitting timeline; it makes it more predictable.
The majority of “slow” projects stem from missing information, not bureaucratic resistance.
Certified factories maintain approved Quality System Manuals (QSMs) and undergo routine audits by state modular programs or third-party inspectors.
Projects from certified factories still undergo full code review, but documentation already aligns with state formatting and terminology. That reduces clarification and correction requests.
“Certification doesn’t make reviews faster; it makes them smoother because everyone’s speaking the same language.” — Stephen Shang, CEO, Falcon Structures
Permitting is ultimately a conversation between technical professionals.
Clarity and responsiveness matter more than urgency. Keep communication structured:
The result is not faster permitting, but fewer surprises.
Most modular programs review complete plan sets in 4–8 weeks, though some (like California HCD) publicly estimate 4–6 weeks for plan check. Local reviews typically add 2–6 weeks.
Delays usually stem from incomplete documentation, reviewer backlog, or mid-process design changes—not the use of containers themselves.
Not necessarily. Once reviewers are familiar with AC462-compliant modules, plan checks proceed similarly to other modular submittals.
Certified factories don’t skip steps, but their documentation already matches state requirements, reducing clarification rounds.
Yes. The state focuses on the structure; the local AHJ focuses on the site. Running both in parallel reduces total calendar time.
Typically 6–16 weeks, including both state and local review under normal workloads.
Check the state modular program’s website or contact its administrator directly.
Start jurisdiction confirmation early, submit complete packages, and document all communication. Predictability is achieved through preparation, not acceleration.
Permitting timelines for container-based modular projects are manageable when understood early. Typical reviews span 6 to 16 weeks, varying by state workload and submittal completeness.
By aligning documentation with each program’s published requirements, and treating state and local approvals as concurrent partners rather than sequential hurdles, teams can turn permitting from a source of anxiety into a structured, transparent process.